z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Alternate-year pruning may provide temporary savings
Author(s) -
Stephen M. Southwick,
James T. Yeager,
Maxwell Norton,
J.W. Osgood,
Craig Weakley
Publication year - 1994
Publication title -
california agriculture
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.472
H-Index - 25
eISSN - 2160-8091
pISSN - 0008-0845
DOI - 10.3733/ca.v048n06p13
Subject(s) - pruning , revenue , tree (set theory) , quality (philosophy) , mathematics , agroforestry , business , biology , horticulture , finance , mathematical analysis , philosophy , epistemology
Effects of alternate-year pruning over four seasons on fruit production, quality and net revenues per tree compare favorably to those for traditional annual pruning methods. Alternate-year pruning may be feasible for growers interested in reducing pruning costs in a particular season. However, the cost to prune trees in the alternate year significantly affects revenues per tree.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom