z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Growing a Discipline
Author(s) -
Jacqueline C. Vischer,
Tiiu Poldma
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
idea journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2208-9217
pISSN - 1445-5412
DOI - 10.37113/ideaj.vi0.243
Subject(s) - discipline , interior design , strengths and weaknesses , variety (cybernetics) , context (archaeology) , engineering ethics , architecture , design studio , studio , sociology , order (exchange) , pedagogy , computer science , mathematics education , architectural engineering , engineering , epistemology , psychology , social science , visual arts , finance , economics , art , paleontology , philosophy , telecommunications , artificial intelligence , biology
A variety of competing pedagogical orientations have accompanied the evolution of university-based Interior Design teaching. A review of relevant literature indicates that a range of pedagogical models are available, each rooted in a distinct design discipline such as architecture and industrial design. A new undergraduate Interior Design program is described, in order to demonstrate an approach to integrating theory and practice. Diverse teaching influences on the development of a course of study in Interior Design in the context of an established multi-disciplinary design faculty are illustrated. The new program’s pedagogical approach is demonstrated through an examination of the first and second year studio subjects. The paper concludes with a summary of the program’s strengths and weaknesses, and suggestions are made to promote ways to integrate theory and practice through broadening the theoretical discourse that could allow Interior Design to be explored through other relevant and critical social disciplines.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom