English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Background: The American Heart Association (AHA) put forth a set of guidelines for universal standard of care for patients who experience an in-hospital resuscitation event or receive post-cardiac arrest care following an in-hospital or out-of-hospital event. While some studies have suggested that Medical Emergency Response Teams (MERTs) help reduce mortality from unexpected cardiac arrest [1] and reduce the number of unexpected ICU admissions [2], there remains a paucity of data on the impact of formalized training of MERTs on adherence to the recommended AHA guidelines, as well as the impact of quality simulation training in implementing effective MERT training.

Investment versus Impact- Psychosocial and Metric Analysis of High Fidelity Manikin Use in Hospital-Based Emergency Response Team Training