Law and Economics, or Punctum Archimedis in Environmental Law
Author(s) -
Iviko Khavtasi
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
law and world
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2587-5043
pISSN - 2346-7916
DOI - 10.36475/7.4.3
Subject(s) - coase theorem , normative , transaction cost , relevance (law) , economics , jurisprudence , economic shortage , property rights , order (exchange) , productivity , environmental law , law and economics , process (computing) , law , public economics , political science , computer science , microeconomics , linguistics , philosophy , finance , government (linguistics) , macroeconomics , operating system
This article examines the autonomous field of Law and Economics, indicates the importance of integrating the economical methodology in the process of comprehensively understanding the normative order and laments over the undesirable shortage of interdisciplinary education and academic dialogue regarding Law and Economics in Georgia. Moreover, this paper deliberates on the relevance of the Coase theorem for lawyers and policy-makers, displays the specific recommendations of its application in jurisprudence, including elucidating property rights, maximizing economic productivity and minimizing transaction costs. The following article discusses attempts and shortcomings to harmonize a decentralized market solution in environmental law and demonstrates regarding the example of the EU emission trading system that the method of Law and Economics can be used not only for a thorough analysis of the existing model but also as a pragmatic instrument for defining a normative program.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom