z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
The Place of Herodotus’ Constitutional Debate in the History of Political Ideas and the Emergence of Classical Social Theory
Author(s) -
Otto Linderborg
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
akropolis journal of hellenic studies
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.101
H-Index - 1
eISSN - 2536-5738
pISSN - 2536-572X
DOI - 10.35296/jhs.v3i0.43
Subject(s) - argumentative , normative , politics , epistemology , variety (cybernetics) , exposition (narrative) , constitutional theory , extant taxon , sociology , political science , law , philosophy , mathematics , literature , art , statistics , evolutionary biology , biology
This paper investigates the question of which place in the history of political ideas may be assigned to the Constitutional Debate in Herodotus’ Histories, 3.80-82. It is shown that the Herodotean debate represents the earliest extant example of a social theory, in which a variety of distinctly social ordering principles are weighed against each other with normative arguments and in isolation from all sorts of divine authorisations. The article divides into three parts. The first part gives an account of the theoretical predecessors to the classical social theory first evidenced in the Constitutional Debate. The second part consists of an exposition of the socio-intellectual progressions clustered in the Herodotean debate, focussing on developments in constitutional thinking and argumentative evolvement. The third part consists of a close reading of the argumentative and politico-social content of the Constitutional Debate.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom