Shape Estimation of Soft Manipulator Using Stretchable Sensor
Author(s) -
Jinho So,
Uikyum Kim,
Yong Bum Kim,
Dong-Yeop Seok,
Sang Yul Yang,
Kihyeon Kim,
JaeHyeong Park,
Seong Tak Hwang,
Young Jin Gong,
Hyouk Ryeol Choi
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
cyborg and bionic systems
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2097-1087
pISSN - 2692-7632
DOI - 10.34133/2021/9843894
Subject(s) - soft sensor , silicone , curvature , materials science , soft robotics , robot , calibration , tactile sensor , fabrication , computer science , control theory (sociology) , acoustics , mechanical engineering , artificial intelligence , engineering , composite material , process (computing) , mathematics , geometry , physics , medicine , statistics , alternative medicine , control (management) , pathology , operating system
The soft robot manipulator is attracting attention in the surgical fields with its intrinsic softness, lightness in its weight, and safety toward the human organ. However, it cannot be used widely because of its difficulty of control. To control a soft robot manipulator accurately, shape sensing is essential. This paper presents a method of estimating the shape of a soft robot manipulator by using a skin-type stretchable sensor composed of a multiwalled carbon nanotube (MWCNT) and silicone (p7670). The sensor can be easily fabricated and applied by simply attaching it to the surface of the soft manipulator. In its fabrication, MWCNT is sprayed on a teflon sheet, and liquid-state silicone is poured on it. After curing, we turn it over and cover it with another silicone layer. The sensor is fabricated with a sandwich structure to decrease the hysteresis of the sensor. After calibration and determining the relationship between the resistance of the sensor and the strain, three sensors are attached at 120° intervals. Using the obtained data, the curvature of the manipulator is calculated, and the entire shape is reconstructed. To validate its accuracy, the estimated shape is compared with the camera data. We experiment with three, six, and nine sensors attached, and the result of the error of shape estimation is compared. As a result, the minimum tip position error is approximately 8.9 mm, which corresponded to 4.45% of the total length of the manipulator when using nine sensors.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom