Advancing How We Learn from Biodesign to Mitigate Risks with Next-Generation Genome Engineering
Author(s) -
Paul E. Abraham,
Jessy Labbé,
Amber A. McBride
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
biodesign research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2693-1257
DOI - 10.34133/2020/9429650
Subject(s) - crispr , genome editing , genome engineering , computer science , transformative learning , flexibility (engineering) , simplicity , genome , biosecurity , data science , biology , gene , genetics , psychology , ecology , pedagogy , statistics , mathematics , philosophy , epistemology
In the last decade, the unprecedented simplicity and flexibility of the CRISPR-Cas system has made it the dominant transformative tool in gene and genome editing. However, this democratized technology is both a boon and a bane, for which we have yet to understand the full potential to investigate and rewrite genomes (also named “genome biodesign”). Rapid CRISPR advances in a range of applications in basic research, agriculture, and clinical applications pose new risks and raise several biosecurity concerns. In such a fast-moving field of research, we emphasize the importance of properly communicating the quality and accuracy of results and recommend new reporting requirements for results derived from next-generation genome engineering.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom