z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
G protein- and β-arrestin Signaling Profiles of Endothelin Derivatives at the Type A Endothelin Receptor
Author(s) -
Xinyu Xiong,
Nour Nazo,
Ritika Revoori,
Sudarshan Rajagopal,
Matthew A. Sparks
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
kidney360
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2641-7650
DOI - 10.34067/kid.0005462020
Subject(s) - endothelins , endothelin receptor , arrestin , receptor , g protein coupled receptor , endothelin 1 , pharmacology , knockout mouse , medicine , endothelin 3 , endocrinology , functional selectivity , chemistry , biology
Background Endothelin-1 (ET-1) is a potent vasoconstrictor in the cardiovascular system, an effect mediated through the type A endothelin receptor (ET A R), a G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR). Antagonists of the ET A R have shown promising results in randomized clinical trials. However, side effects limit widespread use. Biased agonists have been developed to mitigate the untoward effects of a number of GPCR antagonists. These agents block deleterious G-coupled pathways while stimulating protective β -arrestin pathways. The goal of this study was to test whether there was any significant ligand bias between endothelin derivatives, and whether this could have any physiologic effects in the cardiovascular system. Methods A panel of endothelin derivatives were tested in assays of G protein signaling and β -arrestin 2 recruitment at the ET A R. We then tested the effects of ET-1 on the vasopressor response in wild-type and β -arrestin 1 and 2 KO mice. Results We found the endothelins activated a wide range of G proteins at the ET A R, but none of the endothelin derivatives demonstrated significant biased agonism. Endothelin derivatives did display structure-activity relationships with regards to their degrees of agonism. β -arrestin 1 and 2 knockout mice did not display any differences to wild-type mice in the acute pressor response to ET-1, and β -arrestin 2 knockout mice did not display any blood pressure differences to wild-type mice in the chronic responses to ET-1. Conclusions Our findings are consistent with vasoconstriction being mediated by G proteins with a lack of significant desensitization by β -arrestins at the ET A R. These findings suggest that G protein– and β -arrestin–biased ET A R agonists could have distinct physiologic effects from balanced agonists, although the endothelin peptide scaffold does not appear suitable for designing such ligands.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom