z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Taking Profound Offence Seriously: Freedom of Speech v. Human Dignity
Author(s) -
Raphael CohenAlmagor
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
journal of hate studies
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2169-7442
pISSN - 1540-2126
DOI - 10.33972/jhs.152
Subject(s) - dignity , offensive , argument (complex analysis) , expression (computer science) , wish , limiting , freedom of expression , psychology , social psychology , sociology , law , political science , human rights , economics , computer science , mechanical engineering , management , anthropology , programming language , engineering , biochemistry , chemistry
This study discusses the issue of offence to sensibilities as possible grounds for limiting freedom of expression. This issue is constantly brought to the public agenda, as for example, in the limitation imposed in Israel on the playing of Richard Wagner’s music by Israeli orchestras. The proposed thesis is as follows: The Offence to Sensibilities Argument will take precedence over free expression only in cases where profound and direct damage is inflicted upon the sensibilities of individuals or a target group, undermining their dignity, especially when the speaker’s intentions are to offend the target individual/group under circumstances in which the individual or target group cannot avoid. In every case, it is incumbent upon those who wish to limit expression to examine the content of the expression and its manner, the duration and intensity of the expression, the frequency of the offence, the speaker’s intentions, the circumstances and the likely consequences of the offensive speech. Psychologists should be consulted concerning the severity of each offence.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom