Open Access
Simultaneous Classification of Both Mental Workload and Stress Level Suitable for an Online Passive Brain–Computer Interface
Author(s) -
Mahsa Bagheri,
Sarah Power
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
sensors
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.636
H-Index - 172
ISSN - 1424-8220
DOI - 10.3390/s22020535
Subject(s) - workload , brain–computer interface , computer science , stress (linguistics) , interface (matter) , transfer of learning , cognition , electroencephalography , artificial intelligence , psychology , psychiatry , linguistics , philosophy , bubble , maximum bubble pressure method , parallel computing , operating system
Research studies on EEG-based mental workload detection for a passive BCI generally focus on classifying cognitive states associated with the performance of tasks at different levels of difficulty, with no other aspects of the user’s mental state considered. However, in real-life situations, different aspects of the user’s state such as their cognitive (e.g., level of mental workload) and affective (e.g., level of stress/anxiety) states will often change simultaneously, and performance of a BCI system designed considering just one state may be unreliable. Moreover, multiple mental states may be relevant to the purposes of the BCI—for example both mental workload and stress level might be related to an aircraft pilot’s risk of error—and the simultaneous prediction of states may be critical in maximizing the practical effectiveness of real-life online BCI systems. In this study we investigated the feasibility of performing simultaneous classification of mental workload and stress level in an online passive BCI. We investigated both subject-specific and cross-subject classification approaches, the latter with and without the application of a transfer learning technique to align the distributions of data from the training and test subjects. Using cross-subject classification with transfer learning in a simulated online analysis, we obtained accuracies of 77.5 ± 6.9% and 84.1 ± 5.9%, across 18 participants for mental workload and stress level detection, respectively.