z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Comparison Among Three Fixed Palatal Expander Appliances: An in Vitro Study
Author(s) -
Hussain Obaidi,
Mahmoud Al-Mallah
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
˜al-œrafidain dental journal/maǧallaẗ al-rāfidayn li-ṭibb al-asnān
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1998-0345
pISSN - 1812-1217
DOI - 10.33899/rden.2014.89251
Subject(s) - hyrax , premolar , molar , arch , significant difference , orthodontics , materials science , dentistry , medicine , engineering , structural engineering
Aims: To evaluate the effect of three different palatal expanders (Hyrax, Quad-Helix and W-Arch) on maxillary 1st premolar, 2nd premolar and 1st molar width changes. Materials and Methods: The sample consisted of three groups, the Hyrax (N=10), the Quad-Helix (N=10) and the W-Arch (N=10). Images were taken before and after expansion; analysis were made using Autodesk AutoCAD© program. One-way ANOVA and Duncan's multiple range tests were used (P ≤ 0.05). Results: Significant difference was found in the maxillary 1st premolar, 2nd premolar and 1st molar width changes between the Hyrax and the other two expanders, while there was no significant difference between the QuadHelix and the W-Arch expanders. Conclusion: Maxillary arch width increases more consistently with the Hyrax expanders.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom