The Fracture Pattern of Different Mandibular Over–Denture Designs
Author(s) -
Ahmed Hussein
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
al-rafidain dental journal/maǧallaẗ al-rāfidayn li-ṭibb al-asnān
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1998-0345
pISSN - 1812-1217
DOI - 10.33899/rden.2007.9048
Subject(s) - dentures , acrylic resin , bar (unit) , materials science , dentistry , fracture (geology) , orthodontics , dome (geology) , significant difference , composite material , medicine , geology , paleontology , oceanography , coating
Aims: To evaluate the load at fracture for different mandibular over–dentures and the positions of the fracture area for these designs. Material and methods: Ten mandibular dentures were made, each of two designs. The first design consisted of acrylic resin over–denture supported by two dome–shaped 3 mm mandibular canines copings, the second design consisted of two dome–shaped copings connected with a rigid metallic bar. The mean and standard deviation were calculated in addition to the analysis of variance which showed a significant difference at P < 0.05. Results: Showed that the over–denture supported by two dome shaped mandibular canines were more fracture resistance than the over–denture supported with the bar. The fracture position depends on the denture design. Conclusions: The results indicated that the denture made entirely of acrylic resin was much more stronger than the denture with less thickness due to the incorporation on metallic rigid bar.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom