z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Disentangling Risk and Uncertainty: When Risk-Taking Measures Are Not About Risk
Author(s) -
Kristel De Groot,
Roy Thurik
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
frontiers in psychology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.947
H-Index - 110
ISSN - 1664-1078
DOI - 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02194
Subject(s) - psychology , task (project management) , scale (ratio) , risk assessment , cognitive psychology , measure (data warehouse) , risk analysis (engineering) , social psychology , applied psychology , computer science , data mining , medicine , physics , computer security , management , quantum mechanics , economics
Many studies claim to measure decision-making under risk by employing the Domain-Specific Risk-Taking (DOSPERT) scale, a self-report measure, or the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART), a behavioural task. However, these tasks do not measure decision-making under risk but decision-making under uncertainty, a related but distinct concept. The present commentary discusses both the theoretical and empirical basis of the distinction between uncertainty and risk from the viewpoint of several scientific disciplines and reports how many studies wrongfully employ the DOSPERT scale and BART as risk-taking measures. Importantly, we call for proper distinguishing between (tasks measuring) decision-making under uncertainty and decision-making under risk in psychology, and related fields. We believe this is vital as research has shown that people’s attitudes, behaviour, and brain activity differ between both concepts, indicating that confusing the concepts may lead researchers to erroneous conclusions.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom