z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Risk-Taking and Impulsivity: The Role of Mood States and Interoception
Author(s) -
Aleksandra M. Herman,
Hugo Critchley,
Theodora Duka
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
frontiers in psychology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.947
H-Index - 110
ISSN - 1664-1078
DOI - 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01625
Subject(s) - impulsivity , psychology , sensation seeking , mood , personality , big five personality traits , trait , iowa gambling task , anxiety , cognition , developmental psychology , affect (linguistics) , anxiety sensitivity , clinical psychology , cognitive psychology , social psychology , psychiatry , communication , computer science , programming language
Objectives: The consequences of impulsive decisions and actions represent a major source of concern to the health and well-being of individuals and society. It is, therefore, crucial to understand the factors which contribute to impulsive behaviors. Here, we examined how personality traits of behavioral tendencies, interoceptive sensibility as well as transient mood states predict behavioral performance on impulsivity and risk-taking tasks. Method: 574 (121 males; age 18–45) individuals completed self-report personality measures of impulsivity, reward sensitivity, punishment avoidance as well as interoceptive sensibility, undertook a mood assessment and performed a set of cognitive tasks: delay discounting (temporal impulsivity), probability discounting (risk-taking), and reflection impulsivity task. Data were interrogated using principal component analysis, correlations and regression analyses to test mutual relationships between personality traits, interoceptive sensibility, mood state and impulsive behaviors. Results: We observed a clear separation of measures used, both trait and behavioral. Namely, sensation-seeking, reward sensitivity and probability discounting reflected risk-taking. These were separate from measures associated with impulsivity, both trait (negative and positive urgency, premeditation, perseverance) and behavioral (delayed discounting and reflection impulsivity). This separation was further highlighted by their relationship with the current emotional state: positive affect was associated with increased risk-taking tendencies and risky decision-making, while negative emotions were related to heightened impulsivity measures. Interoceptive sensibility was only associated with negative emotions component. Conclusion: Our findings support the proposal that risk-taking and impulsivity represent distinct constructs that are differentially affected by current mood states. This novel insight enhances our understanding of impulsive behaviors.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom