z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Invisibility and interpretation
Author(s) -
Michael H. Herzog,
Frouke Hermens,
Haluk Öğmen
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
frontiers in psychology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.947
H-Index - 110
ISSN - 1664-1078
DOI - 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00975
Subject(s) - invisibility , visibility , masking (illustration) , interpretation (philosophy) , psychology , cognitive psychology , backward masking , visual masking , element (criminal law) , computer science , cognitive science , communication , artificial intelligence , visual perception , perception , physics , optics , visual arts , art , neuroscience , political science , law , programming language
Invisibility is often thought to occur because of the low-level limitations of the visual system. For example, it is often assumed that backward masking renders a target invisible because the visual system is simply too slow to resolve the target and the mask separately. Here, we propose an alternative explanation in which invisibility is a goal rather than a limitation and occurs naturally when making sense out of the plethora of incoming information. For example, we present evidence that (in)visibility of an element can strongly depend on how it groups with other elements. Changing grouping changes visibility. In addition, we will show that features often just appear to be invisible but are in fact visible in a way the experimenter is not aware of.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom