English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The present paper reviews current knowledge on how changes of plant metabolism under elevated CO 2  concentrations (e[CO 2 ]) can affect the development of the glyphosate resistance of C 3  and C 4  weeds. Among the chemical herbicides, glyphosate, which is a non-selective and post-emergence herbicide, is currently the most widely used herbicide in global agriculture. As a consequence, glyphosate resistant weeds, particularly in major field crops, are a widespread problem and are becoming a significant challenge to future global food production. Of particular interest here it is known that the biochemical processes involved in photosynthetic pathways of C 3  and C 4  plants are different, which may have relevance to their competitive development under changing environmental conditions. It has already been shown that plant anatomical, morphological, and physiological changes under e[CO 2 ] can be different, based on (i) the plant’s functional group, (ii) the available soil nutrients, and (iii) the governing water status. In this respect, C 3  species are likely to have a major developmental advantage under a CO 2  rich atmosphere, by being able to capitalize on the overall stimulatory effect of e[CO 2 ]. For example, many tropical weed grass species fix CO 2  from the atmosphere via the C 4  photosynthetic pathway, which is a complex anatomical and biochemical variant of the C 3  pathway. Thus, based on our current knowledge of CO 2  fixing, it would appear obvious that the development of a glyphosate-resistant mechanism would be easier under an e[CO 2 ] in C 3  weeds which have a simpler photosynthetic pathway, than for C 4  weeds. However, notwithstanding this logical argument, a better understanding of the biochemical, genetic, and molecular measures by which plants develop glyphosate resistance and how e[CO 2 ] affects these measures will be important before attempting to innovate sustainable technology to manage the glyphosate-resistant evolution of weeds under e[CO 2 ]. Such information will be of essential in managing weed control by herbicide use, and to thus ensure an increase in global food production in the event of increased atmospheric [CO 2 ] levels.

Glyphosate Resistance of C3 and C4 Weeds under Rising Atmospheric CO2