z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Glyphosate Resistance of C3 and C4 Weeds under Rising Atmospheric CO2
Author(s) -
Nimesha Fernando,
Sudheesh Manalil,
Singarayer Florentine,
Bhagirath Singh Chauhan,
Saman Seneweera
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
frontiers in plant science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.752
H-Index - 125
ISSN - 1664-462X
DOI - 10.3389/fpls.2016.00910
Subject(s) - glyphosate , photosynthesis , biology , weed , agronomy , agriculture , nutrient , herbicide resistance , resistance (ecology) , ecology , botany
The present paper reviews current knowledge on how changes of plant metabolism under elevated CO 2 concentrations (e[CO 2 ]) can affect the development of the glyphosate resistance of C 3 and C 4 weeds. Among the chemical herbicides, glyphosate, which is a non-selective and post-emergence herbicide, is currently the most widely used herbicide in global agriculture. As a consequence, glyphosate resistant weeds, particularly in major field crops, are a widespread problem and are becoming a significant challenge to future global food production. Of particular interest here it is known that the biochemical processes involved in photosynthetic pathways of C 3 and C 4 plants are different, which may have relevance to their competitive development under changing environmental conditions. It has already been shown that plant anatomical, morphological, and physiological changes under e[CO 2 ] can be different, based on (i) the plant’s functional group, (ii) the available soil nutrients, and (iii) the governing water status. In this respect, C 3 species are likely to have a major developmental advantage under a CO 2 rich atmosphere, by being able to capitalize on the overall stimulatory effect of e[CO 2 ]. For example, many tropical weed grass species fix CO 2 from the atmosphere via the C 4 photosynthetic pathway, which is a complex anatomical and biochemical variant of the C 3 pathway. Thus, based on our current knowledge of CO 2 fixing, it would appear obvious that the development of a glyphosate-resistant mechanism would be easier under an e[CO 2 ] in C 3 weeds which have a simpler photosynthetic pathway, than for C 4 weeds. However, notwithstanding this logical argument, a better understanding of the biochemical, genetic, and molecular measures by which plants develop glyphosate resistance and how e[CO 2 ] affects these measures will be important before attempting to innovate sustainable technology to manage the glyphosate-resistant evolution of weeds under e[CO 2 ]. Such information will be of essential in managing weed control by herbicide use, and to thus ensure an increase in global food production in the event of increased atmospheric [CO 2 ] levels.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom