z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
The Fibrotic Substrate in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Patients: Comparison Between Predictions From Computational Modeling and Measurements From Focal Impulse and Rotor Mapping
Author(s) -
Patrick M. Boyle,
Joe B. Hakim,
Sohail Zahid,
William H. Franceschi,
Michael J. Murphy,
Adityo Prakosa,
Konstantinos N. Aronis,
Tarek Zghaib,
Muhammed Balouch,
Esra Gücük İpek,
Jonathan Chrispin,
Ronald D. Berger,
Hiroshi Ashikaga,
Joseph E. Marine,
Hugh Calkins,
Saman Nazarian,
David Spragg,
Natalia A. Trayanova
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
frontiers in physiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.32
H-Index - 102
ISSN - 1664-042X
DOI - 10.3389/fphys.2018.01151
Subject(s) - atrial fibrillation , medicine , ablation , catheter ablation , cardiology , magnetic resonance imaging , intracardiac injection , nuclear medicine , radiology
Focal impulse and rotor mapping (FIRM) involves intracardiac detection and catheter ablation of re-entrant drivers (RDs), some of which may contribute to arrhythmia perpetuation in persistent atrial fibrillation (PsAF). Patient-specific computational models derived from late gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (LGE-MRI) has the potential to non-invasively identify all areas of the fibrotic substrate where RDs could potentially be sustained, including locations where RDs may not manifest during mapped AF episodes. The objective of this study was to carry out multi-modal assessment of the arrhythmogenic propensity of the fibrotic substrate in PsAF patients by comparing locations of RD-harboring regions found in simulations and detected by FIRM (RD sim and RD FIRM ) and analyze implications for ablation strategies predicated on targeting RDs. For 11 PsAF patients who underwent pre-procedure LGE-MRI and FIRM-guided ablation, we retrospectively simulated AF in individualized atrial models, with geometry and fibrosis distribution reconstructed from pre-ablation LGE-MRI scans, and identified RD sim sites. Regions harboring RD sim and RD FIRM were compared. RD sim were found in 38 atrial regions (median [inter-quartile range (IQR)] = 4 [3; 4] per model). RD FIRM were identified and subsequently ablated in 24 atrial regions (2 [1; 3] per patient), which was significantly fewer than the number of RD sim -harboring regions in corresponding models ( p < 0.05). Computational modeling predicted RD sim in 20 of 24 (83%) atrial regions identified as RD FIRM -harboring during clinical mapping. In a large number of cases, we uncovered RD sim -harboring regions in which RD FIRM were never observed (18/22 regions that differed between the two modalities; 82%); we termed such cases “latent” RD sim sites. During follow-up (230 [180; 326] days), AF recurrence occurred in 7/11 (64%) individuals. Interestingly, latent RD sim sites were observed in all seven computational models corresponding to patients who experienced recurrent AF (2 [2; 2] per patient); in contrast, latent RD sim sites were only discovered in two of four patients who were free from AF during follow-up (0.5 [0; 1.5] per patient; p < 0.05 vs. patients with AF recurrence). We conclude that substrate-based ablation based on computational modeling could improve outcomes.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom