z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Employer Credit Checks: Poverty Traps versus Matching Efficiency
Author(s) -
Dean Corbae,
Andrew Glover
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
household finance ejournal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Reports
DOI - 10.3386/w25005
Subject(s) - matching (statistics) , poverty , economics , business , statistics , mathematics , economic growth
We develop a framework to understand pre-employment credit screening through adverse selection in labor and credit markets. Workers differ in an unobservable characteristic that induces a positive correlation between labor productivity and repayment rates in credit markets. Firms therefore prefer to hire workers with good credit because it correlates with high productivity. A poverty trap may arise, in which an unemployed worker with poor credit has a low job finding rate, but cannot improve her credit without a job. In our calibrated economy, this manifests as a large and persistent wage loss from default, equivalent to 2.3% per month over ten years. Banning employer credit checks eliminates the poverty trap, but pools job seekers and reduces matching efficiency: average unemployment duration rises by 13% for the most productive workers after employers are banned from using credit histories to screen potential hires.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom