The Long-term Consequences of Teacher Discretion in Grading of High-stakes Tests
Author(s) -
Rebecca Diamond,
Petra Persson
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
nber working paper series
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Reports
DOI - 10.3386/w22207
Subject(s) - discretion , grading (engineering) , earnings , human capital , psychology , term (time) , test (biology) , mathematics education , perception , estimator , demographic economics , econometrics , economics , political science , accounting , statistics , mathematics , economic growth , engineering , civil engineering , physics , quantum mechanics , law , paleontology , neuroscience , biology
We examine the long-term consequences of teacher discretion in grading of high-stakes tests. Bunching in Swedish math test score distributions reveal that teachers inflate students who have “a bad test day,” but do not to discriminate based on immigrant status or gender. By developing a new estimator, we show that receiving a higher grade leads to far-reaching educational and earnings benefits. Because grades do not directly raise human capital, these results emphasize that grades can signal to students and teachers within the educational system, and suggest important dynamic complementarities between students’ effort and their perception of their own ability.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom