Materialised Ideals: Sizes and Beauty
Author(s) -
Kirsi Laitala,
Ingun Grimstad Klepp,
Benedicte Hauge
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
culture unbound journal of current cultural research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2000-1525
DOI - 10.3384/cu.2000.1525.11319
Subject(s) - clothing , beauty , blame , advertising , marketing , sizing , business , psychology , aesthetics , social psychology , art , political science , visual arts , law
Today’s clothing industry is based on a system where clothes are made in ready-to-wear sizes and meant to fit most people. Studies have pointed out that consumers are discontent with the use of these systems: size designations are not accurate enough to find clothing that fits, and different sizes are poorly available. This article discusses in depth who these consumers are, and which consumer groups are the most dissatisfied with today’s sizing systems. Results are based on a web survey where 2834 Nordic consumers responded, complemented with eight in-depth interviews, market analysis on clothing sizes and in-store trouser size measurements. Results indicate that higher shares of the consumers who have a body out of touch with the existing beauty ideals express discontentment with the sizing systems and the poor selection available. In particular, large women, very large men, and thin, short men are those who experience less priority in clothing stores and have more difficulties in finding clothes that fit. Consumers tend to blame themselves when the clothes do not fit their bodies, while our study points out that the industry is to blame as they do not produce clothing for all customers
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom