A Comparison of Two Equivalent Real Formulations for Complex-Valued Linear Systems Part 2: Results
Author(s) -
Abnita Munankarmy,
Michael A. Heroux
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
american journal of undergraduate research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2375-8732
pISSN - 1536-4585
DOI - 10.33697/ajur.2003.005
Subject(s) - linear system , solver , focus (optics) , complex plane , computer science , complex system , eigenvalues and eigenvectors , iterative refinement , sequence (biology) , algorithm , mathematics , mathematical optimization , artificial intelligence , mathematical analysis , physics , quantum mechanics , optics , biology , genetics
Many iterative linear solver packages focus on real-valued systems and do not deal well with complex-valued systems, even though preconditioned iterative methods typically apply to both real and complex-valued linear systems. Instead, commonly available packages such as PETSc [1] and Aztec [2] tend to focus on the real-valued systems, while complex-valued systems are seen as a late addition. At the same time, by changing the complex problem into an equivalent real formulation (ERF), a real valued solver can be used. In this paper we consider two ERF’s that can be used to solve complex-valued linear systems. We investigate the spectral properties of each and show how each can be preconditioned to move eigenvalues in a cloud around the point (1,0) in the complex plane. Finally, we consider an interleaved formulation, combining each of the previously mentioned approaches, and show that the interleaved form achieves a better outcome than either separate ERF.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom