Making or Buying Environmental Public Goods: Do Consumers Care?
Author(s) -
Douadia Bougherara,
Sandrine Costa,
Mario F. Teisl
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
land economics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.961
H-Index - 86
eISSN - 1543-8325
pISSN - 0023-7639
DOI - 10.3368/le.89.4.767
Subject(s) - purchasing , externality , willingness to pay , business , public good , greenhouse gas , marketing , economics , microeconomics , ecology , biology
Firms may voluntarily abate pollution using one of two options: internalizing their own external effects and incurring abatement costs (“making”), or delegating environmental protection by purchasing offsets (“buying”). We aim to elicit consumers’ willingness to pay for producers’ use of the “making” option as compared to the “buying” option, controlling for spatial effects (joint local public goods), and level of greenhouse gas emissions. Using a stated-choice survey of 722 respondents, we find consumers are more willing to pay for a “making” policy. Consumers do significantly care for the producers’ use of offsets when the level of local externalities is controlled for. (JEL Q54, Q58)
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom