z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Erratum
Author(s) -
Nezih Dagdeviren
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
yonsei medical journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.702
H-Index - 63
eISSN - 1976-2437
pISSN - 0513-5796
DOI - 10.3349/ymj.2005.46.3.448
Subject(s) - computer science
TO Fig. 1. Item analysis of the different questions. Legend: 1=poor, 2=bad, 3=average, 4=good, 5= excellent, M-N/A=missing or not applicable. Items: 1=Helping you understand the importance of following his or her advice; 2=Physical examination of you; 3=Thoroughness; 4=Listening to you; 5=Knowing what s/he had done or told you during contacts; 6=Keeping your records and data confidential; 7=Explaining the purpose of tests and treatments; 8=Interest in your personal situation; 9=Making it easy for you tell him or her about your problem; 10= Making you feel you had time during consultation; 11=Offering you services for preventing diseases (e.g. screening, immunizations); 12= Helping you to feel well so that you can perform your normal daily activities; 13=Quick relief of your symptoms; 14=Involving you in decisions about your medical care; 15=Helping you deal with emotional problems related with your health status; 16=Telling you what you wanted to know about your symptoms and/or illness; 17=Getting through to the practice on the telephone; 18=Providing quick services for urgent health problems; 19=Being able to speak to the general practitioner on the telephone; 20=The helpfulness of the staff (other than the doctor); 21=Preparing you for what to expect from the specialist or hospital care; 22=Getting an appointment to suit you; 23=Waiting time in the waiting room.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom