z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Comparison of Osmolarity of Various Artificial Tears Products Commercially Available in South Korea
Author(s) -
In Ho Woo,
Jun Gi Hong,
Jung Huh,
Youngsub Eom,
Hyo Myung Kim,
Jong Suk Song
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
journal of the korean ophthalmological society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.12
H-Index - 2
eISSN - 2092-9374
pISSN - 0378-6471
DOI - 10.3341/jkos.2018.59.2.117
Subject(s) - medicine , tears , artificial tears , ophthalmology , osmotic concentration , optometry , traditional medicine , surgery
Purpose: To compare the osmolarity of various artificial tear products commercially available in the Republic of Korea. Methods: The osmolarity of the artificial tears was analyzed using TearLab and Multi-OsmetteTM. We divided the artificial tear products into five groups, including hypo-osmolar 0.18% sodium hyaluronate (HA), iso-osmolar 0.1%, 0.15%, 0.3% HA, and 0.5% carboxymethylcellulose sodium (CMC), and measured three products per group. Results: Among the 12 products of iso-osmolar artificial tears, there were seven products (58.3%) < 300 mOsm/L, and among the three products of hypo-osmolar artificial tears, there were two products (66.6%) < 150 mOsm/L. A significant difference (p < 0.05) was observed between the iso-osmolar 0.3% HA group and the hypo-osmolar 0.18% HA group. In the iso-osmolar 0.1% HA and 0.15% HA, the difference between the products in each group was approximately 12 mOsm/L, and the CMC group had the smallest deviation among products, which was close to 300 mOsm/L. There was a significant difference of 305.57 ± 6.38 mOsm/L in the iso-osmolar 0.15% HA group, 293.44 ± 8.71 mOsm/L in the 0.1% HA group, and 285.67 ± 3.67 mOsm/L in the 0.3% HA group (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in osmolarity between the iso-osmolar products containing HA and CMC (p = 0.117). Conclusions: There was a difference in osmolarity between the published and actual measured values of commercial artificial tears, and there was a difference in osmolality depending on the content of HA and the manufacturer. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc 2018;59(2):117-122

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom