z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
War through (International) Law? Some Neo-rhetoric of “Othering” in the European “De jure belli ac pacis” Context
Author(s) -
Enrico Arona
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
nordicum-mediterraneum
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 1670-6242
DOI - 10.33112/nm.14.1.18
Subject(s) - rhetoric , context (archaeology) , political science , law , philosophy , history , theology , archaeology
To my grandparents and to my uncles, veterans; to the victims of terrorism, in memoriam. «Whoever rejects the theory of the bellum justum denies the legal nature of international law. War is permitted as a sanction only as a reaction against a wrong suffered, against a definite conduct of states, determined by international law, and permitted only when directed against the state responsible for this conduct. Any war that does not present this character is a violation of international law. This is the substance of the bellum iustum. War is a mass murder, the greatest misfortune of our culture. The elimination of war is a problem of international politics and the most important instrument of international politics is international law ». (H. Kelsen, Peace through Law) SECTION I The problem of peace and the roads to war: an historical investigation on the use of international force

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom