z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
A randomised, partially observer blind, multicentre, head-to-head comparison of a two-dose regimen of Baxter and GlaxoSmithKline H1N1 pandemic vaccines, administered 21 days apart
Author(s) -
KG Nicholson,
Keith R. Abrams,
Sally Batham,
Clark Tw,
Katja Höschler,
Wee Shiong Lim,
M.A. Morillo Medina,
Jonathan S. NguyenVanTam,
Robert C. Read,
Fiona C Warren,
Maria Zambon
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
health technology assessment
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.426
H-Index - 126
eISSN - 2046-4924
pISSN - 1366-5278
DOI - 10.3310/hta14550-04
Subject(s) - medicine , pandemic , regimen , randomized controlled trial , head (geology) , covid-19 , surgery , disease , infectious disease (medical specialty) , geomorphology , geology
To evaluate the immunogenicity of a two-dose schedule of Baxter cell-cultured, non-adjuvanted, whole-virion H1N1 vaccine, and GlaxoSmithKline AS03(A)-adjuvanted split-virion H1N1 vaccine with respect to the EU Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) and the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) licensing criteria.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom