English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

This study aims to examine prudence's role in moderating the effect of bonus mechanism, intangible asset, and inventory intensity ratio on transfer pricing decisions. This research population is all property, real estate & construction companies, and manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2018. The sampling technique uses a purposive sampling method to obtain 109 units of analysis. This study uses moderated regression analysis (MRA), which is processed using IBM SPSS 21. This study proves that the bonus mechanism does not affect, while intangible assets and inventory intensity ratio significantly affect transfer pricing decisions. Prudence is proven to moderate the intangible assets' influence but does not moderate the impact of the bonus mechanism and inventory intensity ratio on transfer pricing decisions. This study concludes that the bonus mechanism does not affect the transfer pricing decision. Prudence is proven to moderate the effect of intangible assets but does not moderate the impact of the bonus mechanism and inventory intensity ratio on transfer pricing decisions.

The Role of Prudence in Moderating the Effect of Bonus Mechanism, Intangible Assets, and Inventory Intensity Ratio on Transfer Pricing