Working paper on the numerical modelling framework to compare different accounting schemes
Author(s) -
Marius Paschen,
Felix Meier,
Wilfried Rickels
Publication year - 2021
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Reports
DOI - 10.3289/oceannets_d1.1
Subject(s) - stylized fact , carbon accounting , carbon sink , carbon fibers , environmental economics , greenhouse gas , carbon credit , environmental science , carbon sequestration , accounting , climate change , computer science , sink (geography) , emissions trading , carbon dioxide , econometrics , business , economics , oceanography , ecology , algorithm , geography , geology , composite number , macroeconomics , cartography , biology
Any integration of extra carbon dioxide removal (CDR) via terrestrial or marine sink enhancement into climate policies requires accounting for their effectiveness in reducing atmospheric carbon concentration and translating this information into the amount of carbon credits (to be used in official and voluntary emission trading schemes). Here, we assess accounting schemes in their appropriateness of assigning carbon credits. We discuss the role of temporary carbon storage and present the various ccounting methods for carbon credit assignment. We explain how we have implemented the methods numerically and analyse carbon assignments across the different accounting schemes, using stylized, model-based ocean sink enhancement experiments.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom