English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

From the Global Intellectual Property Center (GIPC) survey, Indonesia still considered weak in protecting intellectual property. Then the political direction of law began to look at the concept of the omnibus law to promote the ease of doing business (EoDB). Therefore, the purpose of this study is to analyze first, the legal protection issues of famous brand holders in Act No. 20/2016 through political instruments and criminal law policies. Secondly, the concept of the omnibus law as ius constituendum of the Act Related to Indonesian Intellectual Property in the political perspective of criminal law. The normative method was chosen because of the object of the study on the principles of law, theories, and doctrines of jurisprudence. The results of this study show that although Indonesia's IPR index score increased in 2019, it's global ranking declined. This means that despite increases in scores, Indonesia's IPR enforcement tends to be stagnant when compared to other countries. The IPR-related Act can be combined into an omnibus law. The aim is to simplify the laws of Patents, Trademarks, Copyrights, Industrial Designs, Layout Designs of Integrated Circuits, and Communal Investment Credit which greatly affect the economy and investment in Indonesia.

The Politics of Criminal Law in Trademarks and Future Concept of Omnibus Law for IPR