z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Policy Forum: The Case for an Annual Net Wealth Tax
Author(s) -
Andrew Jackson,
Toby Sanger
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
canadian tax journal/revue fiscale canadienne
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 0008-5111
DOI - 10.32721/ctj.2020.68.3.pf.jackson
Subject(s) - economics , national wealth , public economics , indirect tax , double taxation , tax reform , tax deferral , capital (architecture) , inequality , revenue , distribution (mathematics) , gross income , tax revenue , direct tax , state income tax , finance , mathematical analysis , mathematics , archaeology , history
The public and policy makers are showing a renewed interest in wealth taxes as a possible response to the problem of wealth inequality. This article describes the recent trend of rising wealth inequality, and the factors contributing to it, in developed countries, including Canada. The authors argue that an annual wealth tax could and should counter the trend, and that such a tax is both justifiable on economic grounds and technically feasible. They assert that the taxation of capital income does not adequately address the largely tax-free accumulation of large fortunes, and that an annual wealth tax is preferable to property taxes, which exclude the taxation of financial assets and are levied on gross rather than net wealth. The article responds in detail to major criticisms of an annual tax on wealth, arguing that such a tax is needed to achieve a more equal distribution of wealth while raising additional revenues.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom