z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Policy Forum: Independent Platform Costing—Balancing the Interests of the Public and Parties
Author(s) -
Scott Cameron
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
canadian tax journal/revue fiscale canadienne
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 0008-5111
DOI - 10.32721/ctj.2020.68.2.pf.cameron
Subject(s) - activity based costing , parliament , legislation , balance (ability) , politics , public administration , officer , service (business) , political science , business , law , accounting , marketing , medicine , physical medicine and rehabilitation
This article provides an evaluation of the design of independent election platform costing in Canada, as established by the Parliament of Canada Act and the operating decisions of the parliamentary budget officer. The author compares the balance struck between serving the interests of the public and the interests of political parties in Canada with the balance struck in the Netherlands and Australia. Although Canada's legislation is tilted in favor of serving political parties, in practice the costing culture that evolved during the 2019 general election raised the level of debate and produced an amount of information comparable to what would be expected of a service designed to favor the public. The article concludes with a discussion of options for expanding the policy-costing service for future elections.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom