z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
How journalism educators discuss journalism law in their community of practice : insights from a qualitative textual analysis
Author(s) -
Leslie Klein
Publication year - 2021
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Dissertations/theses
DOI - 10.32469/10355/85845
Subject(s) - journalism , technical journalism , documentation , censorship , sociology , public relations , meaning (existential) , qualitative research , political science , media studies , law , psychology , social science , computer science , programming language , psychotherapist
Often, journalism teachers are the only ones at their school who do their job, and even when the positions are embedded in arts or English departments, it can be isolating. The Journalism Education Association's Listserv creates a virtual community of practice (CoP) for members to contribute to the shared knowledge of best practices in journalism education. The purpose of this research was to understand how middle and high school journalism educators discuss journalism law and its related topics on the Listserv to determine what additional legal resources might benefit the JEA community. This research, via qualitative textual analysis, examined how advisers used their CoP to build shared meaning of journalism law. The study found that journalism advisers primarily use their CoP for Discussing Developments, Documentation Projects, Problem-solving, and Requests for Information. The primary topics discussed on the Listserv were censorship and copyright. The way advisers discussed journalism law varied based on the topic, but most posts were reactions to things that had already happened, either in the news or to individual educators.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom