z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Commerce clause new federalism in the Rehnquist and Roberts courts : dynamics of culture wars constitutionalism, 1964-2012
Author(s) -
Roger Robinson
Publication year - 2017
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Dissertations/theses
DOI - 10.32469/10355/66840
Subject(s) - commerce clause , federalism , constitutionalism , constitution , dormant commerce clause , legislation , cooperative federalism , proposition , political science , economic justice , law , interpretation (philosophy) , law and economics , sociology , linguistics , philosophy , politics , democracy
Commerce Clause New Federalism in the Rehnquist and Roberts Courts describes how interpretation of the Commerce Clause of the Constitution has evolved since the Constitution was first ratified by the several states. It shows how the clause, which was originally included to facilitate trade between the states by removing barriers to trade, evolved into Congress' primary justification for all kinds of actions that had previously been the domains of the states. The work includes case studies of four controversial cases that occurred when the Chief Justice was William Rehnquist along with a case study of National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius decided in the court of Chief Justice John Roberts. The work also makes the case that commerce-clause-based legislation was a critical contributor to the current culture wars occurring in America because each piece of legislation becomes a winner take all proposition with national ramifications.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom