z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Membrane wastewater treatment processes for improved nutrient removal and degradation of synthetic organic nitrogen compounds
Author(s) -
Zhihua Liang
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
mospace institutional repository (university of missouri)
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Dissertations/theses
DOI - 10.32469/10355/14419
Subject(s) - membrane fouling , wastewater , membrane bioreactor , nitrification , anoxic waters , aeration , chemistry , denitrification , effluent , pulp and paper industry , sewage treatment , membrane reactor , organic matter , environmental engineering , bioreactor , nutrient , environmental science , fouling , environmental chemistry , nitrogen , membrane , organic chemistry , engineering , biochemistry
The eutrophication problem in US wastewater treatment plants becomes more serious with increasing discharge of nutrients from wastewater to water bodies. The US EPA has required more stringent discharge standards on nutrients for higher effluent water quality. The main objective of this research is to investigate cost-effective and efficient environmental technologies such as membrane bioreactors (MBR) and membrane aerated biofilm reactors (MABR) for improved nitrogen removal and recalcitrant organic nitrogen compounds removal. In this research, the MABR process had demonstrated efficient organic matter and nitrogen removal through simultaneous nitrification and denitrification with low sludge production. The metabolic selection via alternating anoxic/aerobic processes in the modified Ludzack-Ettinger (MLE) type MBR systems resulted in higher bacterial activities and improved nutrient removal than those of integrated fixed-film MBR (IFMBR) systems. The results of a start-up performance study of MBR systems indicated that MBR process configuration and reactor type affect MBR performance, membrane fouling, nutrient removal, and biomass activities. The high biomass MBR systems demonstrated good and stable nitrophenol biodegradation performance with simultaneous nitrogen removal. . The membrane flux and TMP profiles suggested that continuous stirred-tank reactor (CSTR) reactor type MBR appeared to have much better membrane fouling control performance than that of the pseudo-plug-flow-reactor type of MLEMBR due to the difference of metabolic uncoupling by nitrophenol compounds in MBR systems.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom