Differential gene and protein expression in pig nuclear transfer extraembryonic membranes and blastocyst stage embryos
Author(s) -
Kristin M. Whitworth
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
mospace institutional repository (university of missouri)
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Dissertations/theses
DOI - 10.32469/10355/10259
Subject(s) - blastocyst , somatic cell nuclear transfer , reprogramming , biology , embryo , andrology , cloning (programming) , oocyte , zygote , microbiology and biotechnology , gene expression , embryogenesis , gene , genetics , medicine , computer science , programming language
The following experiments compared the efficiency of three fusion/activation protocols following somatic cell nuclear transfer (NT) with porcine fetal fibroblasts transfected with enhanced green fluorescent protein driven by the chicken beta-actin/rabbit beta-globin hybrid promoter (pCAGGEGFP). The three protocols included electrical fusion/activation (NT1), electrical fusion/activation followed by treatment with a reversible proteasomal inhibitor MG132 (NT2) and electrical fusion in low Ca followed by chemical activation with thimerosal/dithiothreitol (NT3). Data were collected at days 6, 12, 14, 30 and 114 of gestation. Fusion rates, blastocyst-stage mean cell numbers, recovery rates and pregnancy rates were calculated and compared between protocols. Fusion rates were significantly higher for NT1 and NT2 compared to NT3 (p<0.05). There was no significant difference in mean cell number. Pregnancy rate for NT2 was 100% (n=19) at all stages collected and was significantly higher than NT1 (71.4%,n=28; p<0.05), but was not significantly higher than NT3 (82.6%,n=23; p<0.15). Recovery rates were calculated based
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom