Concordance Between Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers with Alzheimer’s Disease Pathology Between Three Independent Assay Platforms
Author(s) -
James D. Doecke,
Alan Rembach,
Victor L. Villemagne,
Shiji Varghese,
Stephanie R. RaineySmith,
Shan Sarros,
Lisbeth Evered,
Christopher Fowler,
Kelly K. Pertile,
Rebecca Rumble,
Brett Trounson,
Kevin Taddei,
Simon M. Laws,
S. Lance Macaulay,
Ashley I. Bush,
Kathryn A. Ellis,
Ralph N. Martins,
David Ames,
Brendan Silbert,
Hugo Vanderstichele,
Colin L. Masters,
David Darby,
QiaoXin Li,
Steven Collins
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
journal of alzheimer s disease
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.677
H-Index - 139
eISSN - 1875-8908
pISSN - 1387-2877
DOI - 10.3233/jad-170128
Subject(s) - concordance , biomarker , cerebrospinal fluid , medicine , positron emission tomography , amyloid (mycology) , pathology , oncology , disease , dementia , alzheimer's disease neuroimaging initiative , nuclear medicine , biology , biochemistry
To enhance the accuracy of clinical diagnosis for Alzheimer's disease (AD), pre-mortem biomarkers have become increasingly important for diagnosis and for participant recruitment in disease-specific treatment trials. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers provide a low-cost alternative to positron emission tomography (PET) imaging for in vivo quantification of different AD pathological hallmarks in the brains of affected subjects; however, consensus around the best platform, most informative biomarker and correlations across different methodologies are controversial.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom