z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Questioning the legitimacy of data
Author(s) -
danah boyd
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
information services and use
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.304
H-Index - 19
eISSN - 1875-8789
pISSN - 0167-5265
DOI - 10.3233/isu-200098
Subject(s) - legitimacy , dissemination , closing (real estate) , data quality , power (physics) , data set , presentation (obstetrics) , set (abstract data type) , computer science , data science , quality (philosophy) , political science , sociology , epistemology , law , business , telecommunications , artificial intelligence , medicine , metric (unit) , philosophy , physics , marketing , quantum mechanics , politics , radiology , programming language
This paper is based upon the closing keynote presentation that was given by danah boyd at the inaugural NISO Plus conference held from February 23–25, 2020 in Baltimore, MD (USA). It focuses on how data are used, and how they can be manipulated to meet specific objectives – both good and bad. The paper reinforces the importance of understanding the biases and limitations of any data set. Topics covered include data quality, data voids, data infrastructures, alternative facts, and agnotology. The paper stresses that data become legitimate because we collectively believe that those data are sound, valid, and fit for use. This not only means that there is power in collecting and disseminating data, but also that there is power in interpreting and manipulating the data. The struggle over data’s legitimacy says more about our society – and our values – than it says about the data itself.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom