z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Use of basis images for detection and classification of celiac disease
Author(s) -
Edward J. Ciaccio,
Christina A. Tennyson,
Govind Bhagat,
Suzanne K. Lewis,
Peter H. Green
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
bio-medical materials and engineering
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.372
H-Index - 53
eISSN - 1878-3619
pISSN - 0959-2989
DOI - 10.3233/bme-141000
Subject(s) - histogram , basis (linear algebra) , villous atrophy , standard deviation , pattern recognition (psychology) , mathematics , abnormality , artificial intelligence , gold standard (test) , medicine , gastroenterology , statistics , image (mathematics) , disease , computer science , coeliac disease , geometry , psychiatry
Celiac disease commonly occurs in approximately 1% of populations, but it can be difficult to diagnose. The standard method to diagnose celiac disease includes analysis of endoscopy images of the small intestinal mucosa to detect presence of villous atrophy, which can be subtle. We have devised a means to improve the image-based detection of villous atrophy and other abnormality in videocapsule endoscopy by means of incorporating basis images. Basis images were extracted from a series of 200 consecutive image frames acquired over 100 seconds at the level of the duodenal bulb in 13 celiac patients and in 13 controls. They were converted from color to 256 grayscale levels (gsl; 0 = black, 255 = white). Eight basis images were used for analysis. A histogram was constructed for each basis image, and the mean and standard deviation of the histogram values were tabulated. The significance of the difference in histogram mean level for celiacs versus controls was determined. Then the histogram mean was plotted versus the standard deviation, separately for all eight basis images, and also averaged for all bases combined. The mean histogram level for celiacs was 127.59+6.05 gsl versus 129.25+5.53 gsl for controls (p< 0.05). Thus celiac basis images tended to be darker and also more variable as compared with controls. For nonlinear classification, using the average of combined basis images, the sensitivity was 84.6% while the specificity was 92.3%. Using the single most important basis image for nonlinear classification, the sensitivity was 84.6% while the specificity was 76.9%. Construction of basis images can be useful to condense videocapsule image series into salient information, for detection of differences in grayscale level mean and variation in celiac versus control image series, and for classification of celiac versus control videoclips with nonlinear discriminant functions.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom