z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Improving the documentation of female genital mutilation or cutting (FGM/C) abandonment interventions and their evaluations
Author(s) -
Caroline W. Kabiru
Publication year - 2020
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Reports
DOI - 10.31899/rh11.1047
Subject(s) - psychological intervention , documentation , abandonment (legal) , female circumcision , accountability , scale (ratio) , public relations , psychology , political science , business , medical education , medicine , nursing , geography , computer science , gynecology , law , programming language , cartography
Funded by Female genital mutilation or cutting (FGM/C) is internationally recognised as a violation of human rights. Consequently, there have been extensive efforts to promote the abandonment of the practice. There is limited evidence on the impact of many of the efforts in part because many interventions are implemented by small organisations with inadequate resources to document and evaluate their activities. The complex nature of FGM/C interventions, as with other interventions aimed at addressing violence against women and girls, also makes it difficult to adequately document what is done, how, when, and with what results. Nonetheless, it is important that implementing organisations make every effort to document and evaluate their interventions, and share the outcomes and lessons learnt to ensure accountability and for others to learn from, adapt, replicate, and scale up successful interventions.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom