z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Die Ökobilanz der energetischen Holzverwertung: Faktoren für einen hohen ökologischen Nutzen
Author(s) -
Bernhard Steubing
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
schweizerische zeitschrift fur forstwesen
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.189
H-Index - 10
eISSN - 2235-1469
pISSN - 0036-7818
DOI - 10.3188/szf.2013.0408
Subject(s) - renewable energy , life cycle assessment , environmental science , greenhouse gas , biomass (ecology) , flue gas , scarcity , efficient energy use , resource (disambiguation) , natural resource economics , environmental economics , environmental protection , waste management , engineering , ecology , production (economics) , economics , computer network , biology , computer science , macroeconomics , microeconomics , electrical engineering
Life cycle assessment of wood energy: factors for high ecological benefits Wood energy is increasingly used to replace non-renewable energy sources. Energy wood is a limited resource and should therefore be used wisely not only to maximize the economic but also the environmental benefits associated with its use. This article assesses the environmental burdens associated with wood energy (for heat, electricity and transportation) and the benefits that may arise when non-renewable energy technologies are substituted. It is shown that from a global warming perspective the use of wood energy seems almost always beneficial, but this effect may be significantly reduced if biogenic CO2 is taken into account. The method of ecological scarcity on the other hand, which considers several additional environmental dimensions and combines these into a single score, shows significantly lower environmental benefits of wood in comparison with non- renewable energy. One of the principal reasons for this are air emissions associated with wood energy such as particulate matter, nitrogen oxides (NOx) and volatile organic carbon (VOC). Considerable environmental benefits can be achieved in both cases if the following three key factors are respected: 1) a wise choice of the substituted technology and the underlying energy carrier, 2) a high efficiency in the conversion from energy contained in biomass to final energy, and 3) the implementation of measures to reduce air emissions such as particle filters and, if possible, more advanced flue gas cleaning. The article then discusses the limits of the comparison and selected issues within the life cycle assessment methodology that need further development.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom