English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This article discusses an exploratory study that characterizes users’ complaints against universities, professional institutes (IP), and technical training centers (CFT), channeled through the consulting systems of organizations related to the higher education system or to the supervision of the delivery of such services. The aim is to identify the type of institutions against which complaints are made, the public agency chosen to express the complaint, the issue that causes the trouble, and the academic period during which the problem originated. Conclusions on which conflicts are cross conflicts, and which tend to become more visible regarding certain type of institutions, or through a certain type of public consulting body, are reached.

The voice of the users: complaints against higher education institutions