English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The aim of this paper is to review the current and most relevant literature on the use of altmetric providers since 2012. This review is supported by a meta-analysis of the coverage and metric counts obtained by more than 100 publications that have used these bibliographic platforms for altmetric studies. The article is the most comprehensive analysis of altmetric data providers ( Lagotto ,  Altmetric.com ,  ImpactStory ,  Mendeley ,  PlumX ,  Crossref Event Data ) and explores the coverage of publications, social media and events from a longitudinal view. Disciplinary differences were also analysed. The results show that most of the studies are based on  Altmetric.com  data. This provider is the service that captures most mentions from social media sites, blogs and news outlets.  PlumX  has better coverage, counting more  Mendeley  readers, but capturing fewer events.  CED  has a special coverage of mentions from  Wikipedia , while  Lagotto  and  ImpactStory  are becoming disused products because of their limited reach.

Altmetrics data providers: A meta-analysis review of the coverage of metrics and publication