Introduction and Evaluation of Virtual Microscopy in Teaching Veterinary Cytopathology
Author(s) -
Jennifer A. Neel,
Carol B. Grindem,
David G. Bristol
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
journal of veterinary medical education
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.457
H-Index - 35
eISSN - 1943-7218
pISSN - 0748-321X
DOI - 10.3138/jvme.34.4.437
Subject(s) - virtual microscopy , cytopathology , curriculum , medical education , preference , test (biology) , virtual laboratory , virtual reality , medical physics , psychology , medicine , pathology , multimedia , computer science , artificial intelligence , biology , mathematics , pedagogy , paleontology , cytology , statistics
Virtual microscopy (VM) uses a computer to view digitized slides and is comparable to using a microscope to view glass slides. This technology has been assessed in human medical education for teaching histology and histopathology, but, to the authors' knowledge, no one has evaluated its use in teaching cytopathology in veterinary medical education. We hypothesize that students will respond positively to the use of VM for viewing cytopathology preparations and that the technology can be successfully used for student assessment. To test this hypothesis, we surveyed students regarding their level of satisfaction with features of the VM system, their preference for use of VM in the curriculum, and the potential influence virtual slides may have on student study habits; student performance on a traditional cytopathology practical examination and a similar exam using VM was evaluated. Our results show that student perception of the VM system is generally very positive, with some concerns about resolution and the need for continued exposure to traditional microscopy. Within the curriculum, students indicated a preference for the option of using virtual slides for studying and take-home exercises. Overwhelmingly, students wanted either hybrid laboratory sessions or sessions using glass slides with virtual slides available for study and review. Students identified many VM test-taking features as advantageous compared with traditional glass-slide practical exams as traditionally administered. However, students indicated a strong preference for continued use of traditional microscopy for graded practical exams. Students may be more likely to study slides in preparation for practical examinations if virtual slides are available. Results also indicate that VM can be used successfully for assessment purposes, but students should receive training in using virtual slides if the technology will be used for assessment.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom