z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Coincidence, Convention or Copycat Crime? A Curious Case of the Twelfth Century
Author(s) -
A. G. Rigg
Publication year - 1999
Publication title -
florilegium
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2369-7180
pISSN - 0709-5201
DOI - 10.3138/flor.16.005
Subject(s) - copycat , outrage , abandonment (legal) , history , convention , law , sociology , political science , psychology , politics , cognitive science
One of the worst things that can befall an academic—and I hope it has never happened to our honorand—is to lose the sole copy of one's current research. The result is at best a delay and at worst the abandonment of the project (I have known two cases of the latter). If the loss is the result of theft, our sense of outrage knows no bounds; fortunately, such events are rare. It is remarkable, therefore, to observe two occurrences of the theft of unique copies of work-in-progress within a few years of each other, in the middle of the twelfth century. Neither case, as far as we know, was ever solved—but both had happy endings.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom