Contraception or Eugenics? Sterilization and “Mental Retardation” in the 1970s and 1980s
Author(s) -
Molly LaddTaylor
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
canadian journal of health history
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.117
H-Index - 13
eISSN - 2371-0179
pISSN - 0823-2105
DOI - 10.3138/cbmh.31.1.189
Subject(s) - eugenics , sterilization (economics) , female sterilization , law , appeal , family planning , medicine , political science , population , research methodology , business , environmental health , exchange rate , foreign exchange market , finance
Nonconsensual sterilization is usually seen as the by-product of a classist and racist society; disability is ignored. This article examines the 1973 sterilization of two young black girls from Alabama and other precedent-setting court cases involving the sterilization of “mentally retarded” white women to make disability more central to the historical analysis of sterilization. It analyzes the concept of mental retardation and the appeal of a surgical solution to birth control, assesses judicial deliberations over the “right to choose” contraceptive sterilization when the capacity to consent is in doubt, and reflects on the shadow of eugenics that hung over the sterilization debate in the 1970s and 1980s.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom