Established and Emerging Decision Constructs – A Taxonomic Perspective
Author(s) -
Chris Barry,
Mairéad Hogan,
Ann M. Torres
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
journal of information and organizational sciences
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.146
H-Index - 13
eISSN - 1846-9418
pISSN - 1846-3312
DOI - 10.31341/jios.40.1.1
Subject(s) - clarity , transactional analysis , transactional leadership , perspective (graphical) , knowledge management , decision process , taxonomy (biology) , computer science , process (computing) , psychology , management science , marketing , data science , process management , business , social psychology , artificial intelligence , engineering , biology , ecology , biochemistry , operating system
One might assume information systems (IS) are developed so systems enhance the user experience and facilitate a satisfying, productive interaction. From prior research, the authors established this assumption was not safe and certain design features amongst some online retailers were atypical of ‘good’ design elsewhere. It was apparent the transactional process was being used to present consumers with optional extras (and other decisions) that not only slowed the process down, but also stressed and agitated users. The research identified some new and unusual decision constructs such as the ‘must-opt’. The objective of the research presented herein is two-fold: to make an incremental contribution in first theorising and then identifying and categorising into a taxonomy some new decision constructs alongside established ones encountered throughout on-line Business-to-Consumer (B2C) transactional processes followed by a preliminary study confirming their existence and examining their clarity.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom