English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Current understanding of the nature of type assumes it to be static, with properties of form and colour. With the introduction of temporal media, typographic artefacts may additionally have properties of behaviour. Digital, temporal media allow type to perform and to evolve. ‘Fluid’ 1 type, as it appears in motion graphics, animation and film title sequences, is ‘dramatized’ 2 . A single form may present multiple letters through processes of morphing, rotation or deconstruction, and multiple forms may present a single letter through processes of reorganisation. Analysis of such artefacts not only requires us to re-evaluate our understanding of the nature of type, but also to reassess the notion that a single letterform may only have a single identity. In this presentation I will discuss the nature of fluid type, referencing examples of typographic performance in screen-based media. I will ask whether these artefacts may be analysed according to established typographic theory, offering suggestions as to how such theory may need to adapt in order to allow for the introduction of temporal media.

One Form, Many Letters: Fluid and transient letterforms in screen-based typographic artefacts