z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Overview of treatment options for invasive fungal infections
Author(s) -
Melanie W. Pound,
Mary L. Townsend,
V. Paul DiMondi,
Dustin Wilson,
Richard H. Drew
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
medical mycology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.004
H-Index - 86
eISSN - 1460-2709
pISSN - 1369-3786
DOI - 10.3109/13693786.2011.560197
Subject(s) - posaconazole , voriconazole , amphotericin b , echinocandins , nephrotoxicity , medicine , aspergillosis , amphotericin b deoxycholate , intensive care medicine , candida infections , antifungal , toxicity , immunology , caspofungin , dermatology
The introduction of several new antifungals has significantly expanded both prophylaxis and treatment options for invasive fungal infections (IFIs). Relative to amphotericin B deoxycholate, lipid-based formulations of amphotericin B have significantly reduced the incidence of nephrotoxicity, but at a significant increase in drug acquisition cost. Newer, broad-spectrum triazoles (notably voriconazole and posaconazole) have added significantly to both the prevention and treatment of IFIs, most notably Aspergillus spp. (with voriconazole) and the treatment of some emerging fungal pathogens. Finally, a new class of parenteral antifungals, the echinocandins, is employed most frequently against invasive candidal infections. While the role of these newer agents continues to evolve, this review summarizes the activity, safety and clinical applications of agents most commonly employed in the treatment of IFIs.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom