z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
6.1.1.1 Discrepancy in HbA1cMeasurements Performed at Different Local Laboratories and at a Selected Central Reference Laboratory
Author(s) -
Per Hyltoft Petersen,
N. A. Klitgaard,
M. Harrder
Publication year - 1993
Publication title -
upsala journal of medical sciences
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.808
H-Index - 41
eISSN - 2000-1967
pISSN - 0300-9734
DOI - 10.3109/03009739309179321
Subject(s) - medicine , statistics , medical physics , mathematics
As participants in a general practice intervention study, 66 patients had their HbA1c measured both at a local and at a selected central reference laboratory. A discrepancy in the results was observed, as 97% of the results measured locally were lower than the centrally determined results. Bias (as calculated from mean value of measured HbA1c) between local laboratories and the central laboratory was measured to -1.47% HbA1c. A bias of this magnitude gave "problems" both to the general practitioners, patients and laboratories. To reduce the "problems" a bias of 0.5% HbA1c is estimated to be acceptable. But, to avoid these "problems" totally, a bias of 0.25% HbA1c is estimated to be the highest allowed bias. For HbA1c, a control system for both control of method standardisation and for specificity is described.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here