
6.1.1.1 Discrepancy in HbA1cMeasurements Performed at Different Local Laboratories and at a Selected Central Reference Laboratory
Author(s) -
Per Hyltoft Petersen,
N. A. Klitgaard,
M. Harrder
Publication year - 1993
Publication title -
upsala journal of medical sciences
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.808
H-Index - 41
eISSN - 2000-1967
pISSN - 0300-9734
DOI - 10.3109/03009739309179321
Subject(s) - medicine , statistics , medical physics , mathematics
As participants in a general practice intervention study, 66 patients had their HbA1c measured both at a local and at a selected central reference laboratory. A discrepancy in the results was observed, as 97% of the results measured locally were lower than the centrally determined results. Bias (as calculated from mean value of measured HbA1c) between local laboratories and the central laboratory was measured to -1.47% HbA1c. A bias of this magnitude gave "problems" both to the general practitioners, patients and laboratories. To reduce the "problems" a bias of 0.5% HbA1c is estimated to be acceptable. But, to avoid these "problems" totally, a bias of 0.25% HbA1c is estimated to be the highest allowed bias. For HbA1c, a control system for both control of method standardisation and for specificity is described.