z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Can a Mixed-Method Literacy Intervention Improve the Reading Achievement of Low-Performing Elementary School Students in an After-School Program?
Author(s) -
James S. Kim,
Lauren Capotosto,
Ardice Hartry,
Robert Fitzgerald
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
educational evaluation and policy analysis
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.636
H-Index - 78
eISSN - 1935-1062
pISSN - 0162-3737
DOI - 10.3102/0162373711399148
Subject(s) - fluency , spelling , reading (process) , reading comprehension , mathematics education , psychology , literacy , vocabulary , phonemic awareness , intervention (counseling) , pedagogy , philosophy , psychiatry , political science , law , linguistics
The authors describe an independent evaluation of the READ 180 Enterprise intervention designed by Scholastic, Inc. Despite widespread use of the program with upper elementary through high school students, there is limited empirical evidence to support its effectiveness. In this randomized controlled trial involving 312 students enrolled in an after-school program, the authors generated intention-to-treat and treatment-on-the-treated estimates of the program’s impact on several literacy outcomes of fourth, fifth, and sixth graders reading below proficiency on a state assessment at baseline. READ 180 Enterprise students outperformed control group students on vocabulary (d = .23) and reading comprehension (d = .32) but not on spelling and oral reading fluency. The authors interpret the findings in light of the theory of instruction underpinning the READ 180 Enterprise intervention.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom